NOTE: I wrote this quite a while ago, as you can probably tell, but never finished it. Now I have. However, I didn't actually, if you want to be technical, have the book when I finished it. Nor did I actually read the whole book. But I did skim it. And get the general idea of it.
Now that the AcaDeca season is over, I'm reading. A lot. I went to the library yesterday and grabbed Strapped: Why America's 20- and 30-Somethings Can't Get Ahead by Tamara Draut. From rifling through it by the bookshelf, I expected it to be inane and whiny. I was right. The book is laughable in its misunderstanding of the world at times, and the book suffers from several endemic flaws.
While the book appears copiously researched and supported, with 28 pages of endnotes, many of Draut's more controversial points are supported not by statistics or scientific studies, but with anecdotes. Stories about people like "Wanda" and "Anna" and "Ed" make up a large portion of the book, without any way to verify their narratives or ask for clarifying details. Of course, she never uses examples of youth that are doing well. (note that I began to reconsider this after I wrote part of it. But I think it's still a good point, partially because I'm too lazy to rework it.)
What's worse is her apparent yearning for someone or something to blame every problem she perceives on. When pondering why so many youth are stuck in credit card debt, she doesn't think about, say, the actions of said youth in respect to their credit cards. No. She blames Congress, the Supreme Court, and credit card companies. For as we all know, in the early 1980s, Congress deregulated credit cards, and that, of course, forced thousands of youth to get credit cards and max them out. And the Supreme Court made a decision that basically let credit card companies charge whatever interest they wanted. Heaven forbid! And those evil, nasty, greedy credit card corporations. We all know they just prey on the youth of America and force them into debt peonage. Exactly what happened. Nothing to do with adolescents looking at the massive availability of credit and going overboard.
But her least obvious fallacy is also her most pernicious. In her final chapter, offering a wide range of "solutions" to these problems (like mandatory paid maternity leave), she states:
It is often said...that todays younger generation suffers from a sense of entitlement....The truth is that the overwhelming majority of young adults suffers from something quite the opposite....they expect too little from our society.
Yet by reading the book, it's clear that she is, indeed, afflicted by a sense of entitlement. Aside from the fact that most of the government programs she proposes, would, in fact, be entitlements, she seems to think that she and these youth do deserve certain perks. Language like "is this too much to ask" (possibly in the book) belies a fundamental sense of entitlement, an assumption that life owes us something.
I'm just glad I don't owe her the $11.16 the book costs on Amazon.
